Being an organic musical artist doesn’t mean you shouldn’t cultivate an image and market yourself. You need to identify your “known unknowns,” create an artistic lane, and rethink your definition of “organic.”
“Nothing attracts a crowd like a crowd” – P.T. Barnum
Without the management of Colonel Tom Parker, Elvis Presley would never have been The King. It is interesting that Parker, not unlike P.T. Barnum, had spent time as carnival huckster, with an affinity for luring bystanders into the tent. Parker understood showmanship and how to monetize talent, which Elvis had. But without Colonel Parker, we probably wouldn’t have ever heard of Elvis.
You may think the image, artistic career arc, and performance style of your musical favorites and influences evolved organically, even magically, as if the artists always had a clear vision of what they were going to be, were always polished and ready to go, and were just waiting for their audience to catch on.
Not so. Just about every popular musical artist was developed artistically and commercially in the marketplace.
Brian Epstein, the Beatles’ manager, worked in his family’s furniture store. He was a music lover, and he also worked in another family business, a record store called North End Music Stores (NEMS), which is how the Beatles came into his awareness. Though he had no previous experience managing a musical act, Epstein had a major influence on the Beatles’ transformation. If the definition of “organic” means “to happen naturally without preconception or outside guidance,” theirs was not a simple organic progression.
In regard to their image, Epstein insisted The Fab Four clean up a bit. Yes, they had unusually long hair for the early ’60s, but Epstein wanted it trimmed evenly and styled. When Epstein met the Beatles, they were scruffy, when he was through with the makeover, they were clean shaven. Epstein even added the touch of the famous black suits with the ties.
Epstein taught the band to bow and thank the audience after completing each song. This promoted the Beatles with the safe, socially acceptable image of four boys you could bring home to mom, which is exactly what Epstein envisioned. What’s more, the Beatles agreed to do it, which is rare. Often, artists will fight taking outside instruction or doing anything foreign to their own creative impulse. You’ve heard it before: “I just want to be as organic as possible.”
Now let’s talk about how Beatlemania began. Did the band cut a record, get distribution in a few records stores, and sit back and watch the pandemonium ensue? No.
Did an army of “tastemakers” pick up their first single, freak out, and share it with two friends, who then told two friends, and so on, until they became a sensation? Not exactly.
Understanding that people respond to momentum, even if it’s manufactured momentum, Epstein helped manipulate the band’s market force by gaming the British charts. He was shrewd enough to know there were 11 record stores in his locality that reported to the chart company. Epstein would send out fans/friends, with his money, and have them purchase records at these select stores on the day of release. This would get the record immediately charting, which got the public and the industry’s attention.
Did this artificially create a #1 record? No. But it did give the Beatles enough credibility to get industry and radio people talking. This clever move also built the bandwagon for consumers to join the ranks of Beatles’ fans because everybody else was clearly liking them. There are the early adopters, and then there are the people who think they’re the early adopters because the crowd is small enough that they’re still part of an exclusive group – but big enough that there’s a bandwagon to hop onto.
So was the Beatles’ rise organic? Maybe. Then again, my definition of organic is usually different than an artist’s. You see, I believe that all the gaming of the system, all the hustle, marketing, all the payola, and all the money in the world won’t make a crappy or derivative record good, or even popular. At the same time, a fresh, original, uniquely talented artist will remain a nobody without applying some or all of these marketing techniques.
Epstein had lightning in a bottle and he knew what to do with it. He was able to introduce it to the public in a manner that allowed it get its own legs and create sustained momentum. Thankfully, the Beatles were smart enough, talented enough, and had enough faith in the strategy to let Epstein execute his plan while they did their part.
So the fact that Andrew Loog Oldham, the original manager for the Rolling Stones, started out as Brian Epstein’s assistant should come as no surprise. Oldham did exactly the same thing with the Stones.
Of course, Oldham needed a new artistic lane. The Stones had to be different. He suggested that the Rolling Stones be the “anti-Beatles.” He wanted them scruffy, not clean cut. He wanted them in leather or hipster mod clothing, not in suits. He wanted them to be dangerous, not “boys you could take home to mother.”
Was this organic? It depends on how you look at it.
As Bill Curbishley, manager of the Who, once said: “When God gives you something special – a talent – he takes a little bit away from somewhere else. If you look at any artist, they’ve all got something missing. And I’m the guy that replaces it.”
Scott Borchetta recognized there were no country artists who were writing and speaking for 9-14 year old kids when he encountered Taylor Swift. They created a whole new artistic lane.
How is your artistic lane different from what is already going on? What pieces are you missing, your “known unknowns,” that will require you to have faith in someone else? Is it time to rethink your definition of “organic”? These are the questions a smart artist should be asking.
Image via Pexels.com.
Johnny Dwinell is a veteran Los Angeles artist/producer/businessman who created Daredevil Production in 2011 to provide innovative artist development in the new music business. In mid 2013 Daredevil Production started a weekly blog as a free resource for artists and songwriters to use for inspiration, advice, support, and knowledge. In late 2013 Johnny Dwinell wrote the bestselling Music Marketing On Twitter book. Thousands of artists and songwriters have improved their understanding and execution of social media with the help of this free book!
15 music marketing mistakes indie artists make
Want music success? You’ve got to love the grind.
Different types of record producer deals
Choosing a Record Producer
Predictions for the music industry: Part 1
2 thoughts on “Are you an organic musical artist? That depends on your definition.”
Hi Murray: I have to respond. I don’t feel talent is a curse. It is a blessing. It’s like food. Some is tasteful and good for you, some is just tasteful, but really not good for you. That’s what I think about music. Does it feed another’s soul good healthy things, or the opposite in the end. Media of different types has a huge effect on society, so is the talent using their talent to take the consciousness of the people receiving it up to be better people, that make better decisions that will bless themselves and others, or the opposite. One way of using a talent for the higher good will bless the person and society and the other way of using it to influence people into thoughts that are not healing for them, in fact harmful for them and others will not bless the talent being expressed and can bring them to the destruction you write of. The younger ones, the girls, they need Uncle Mortchai’s-older men that are saavy to that world to mentor them and keep them protected by teaching them the tricks, the ropes that will be thrown out to them, and watching over them, and the young men also need these elders in their lives to help protect them. Sure enough, many great talents lost their souls and their very lives because they didn’t have those kind of people around them in their circle to have the one on one talks, to sit up late at night and tell them about real life, and that there are consequences for whichever way they decide to live, and whatever image they consent to be cast as that has a huge effect on society and themselves in return. I’ve been to a special meeting called The Cry Hollywood in 2012 (probably you can find You Tubes On It), people in the industry, along with new talent who prayed and are still praying for media (all media) to be used for the true good of the people and not the opposite. This was a very special night at lasted about 5 full hours or more, and I was among the blessed that was in attendance. It included one man that took the microphone and apologized for how the men had been treating the women, and then one woman who in turn responded on behalf of the women and herself in apology for how women used their beauty or manipulation or both to get what they want from men they don’t love. There were eyes full of tears of both men and women, sincere hearts, wanting to have it be right, treating others with the respect they know deep inside they’re supposed to. Since then there have been many family friendly films that came out and were great hits, including tv series, and also since then many musical artists were well received when they’d sing of higher life enhancing thoughts,, successful and benefitted, as they have and are still sharing life enhancing, beneficial music with others of positive thoughts leading to positive actions that will not influence them or their listeners or viewers to think of destructive thoughts or actions of any kind. Oh, what a great night that was! I hope you are benefitted in any way by my sharing. Sincerely,
I don’t know about the “music industry” but money and fame sometimes makes it seem a bit distasteful. People who really love music and are cursed with the ability to produce really great music are often better off hiding it away than stepping into the ring with it. It is like they have been given a special gift but feel forced to have to share it. Many who enter this business don’t make it out alive and those who do, come out a bit damaged.