Copyright Basics: Exclusive rights, licensing lingo, and more

by Keith Hatschek on March 24, 2011 · 24 comments

in Fast Forward

So you’ve written a new song. It may have the potential to be a hit, but one thing is certain: it makes sense to properly protect your song if you hope to profit from its recording and public performance. How do music copyrights work? What is required to have ownership of your song’s copyright? Why should you register it with the Library of Congress? What are some of the common music licenses that generate income for songwriters?

What is a copyright?
According to attorney Don Passman’s authoritative book, All You Need to Know About the Music Business, a copyright is a "limited duration monopoly." When the founding fathers first established copyright in intellectual property, the term of that exclusive control was fourteen years. Since that time, copyright duration has been extended, to the point that today, once you properly register your song’s copyright, you and your heirs will have exclusive control of it for your own life, plus seventy more years.

While most songwriters or their publishers register each new song’s copyright with the Library of Congress (LOC), due to the way copyright law is written, a copyright actually exists the moment you fix your song in any tangible medium. So by recording it, writing out a lead sheet, or simply typing out the lyrics on a word processor and printing them, you have created a tangible copy and at that moment in time, your song is protected by copyright.

So why bother to register your new song with the Library of Congress? Because until such time as it is officially registered as a new work with the LOC, you have some, but not all of the various protections that copyright law provides.

The first and most important result of registering your song with the LOC is that a permanent and unequivocal date of copyright registration is established. Should your song be used without your consent, this date will be used by a court of law to affirm that the use or unauthorized adaptation occurred after you registered your song. Such unauthorized use is commonly referred to as an "infringement."

Once your song has been registered, the full weight of copyright law can be used to protect your song, should it be used unlawfully. Penalties for using a copyrighted work without permission can be substantial, running anywhere between $750 and $30,000 for each infringed work. If a defendant willfully infringed, that is, he or she knew your song was protected by copyright, statutory damages can rise to $150,000 per infringed work.

One more benefit of registering your song is that if you have a valid LOC registration for your song and the court decides in your favor, the infringing party will likely have to pay your legal fees in addition to whatever statutory damages are required.

A copyright owner’s five exclusive rights
Once you have a song that you’ve registered with the LOC, you have the foundation to exploit your song to earn money. Song copyright owners enjoy the same five exclusive rights that any author of a novel, screenplay, painting, poem, or other intellectual work has. These include the right to exclusively:

1. Reproduce the work
2. Distribute the work
3. Perform the work in public
4. Allow a derivative work to be made
5. Display the work in public (applies mostly to visual media and artwork)

Anyone making unauthorized copies without a copyright owner’s permission, distributing unauthorized copies, using a sample without permission, or allowing performance of the work in public without proper payment of public performance royalties is in violation of one or more of these exclusive rights.

In practice, songwriters will often assign their song’s copyright to a music publisher in order to maximize the revenue opportunities. It then becomes the job of the publisher to develop as many licensed uses of your song as possible. Such uses may include cover versions of your song; placements in TV, film, and video games; use of your song in a commercial, greeting card, or on a compilation album. In exchange, the songwriter will normally share the revenue 50-50 with the publisher. Whenever your song is performed on radio or TV, it generates a public performance royalty that the three U.S. Performing Rights Organizations (PROs) – ASCAP, BMI, SESAC – monitor and then collect a royalty on the behalf of the songwriter and publisher. Each writer may only affiliate with one of the PROs.

Song vs. Master copyrights
Prior to 1972, the recording of your song was not protected by copyright, although the underlying musical ideas, usually represented by the lyrics and music that made up your song, were covered. At that time, Congress changed the law to extend copyright protection to sound recordings. This meant that for artists signed to one of the major record labels, the sound recordings they made in the studio usually became the property of the record label, based on the fact that in almost all cases, the label bankrolled these master recordings.

Record labels quickly realized these master rights represented a new stream of royalty income and began to exploit them. When you hear an original recording of a Motown classic such as "I Heard It Through the Grapevine" by Marvin Gaye in a motion picture, Motown/Universal has granted a master license to the filmmaker, while the songwriter’s publishing company, in this case Stone Agate/EMI Music Publishing, granted a song license to use the music in the film. So in this way, a recording of a song has two copyrights simultaneously existing: one in the underlying song, a second in the master recording of that song.

For the DIY band that has released its own album, they can simply send in a copy of their finished album to the LOC and register both the songs and the master recordings to receive full protection. Then, if a filmmaker wishing to use their song were to contact the band, they would be in a position to request a license fee for both the song use AND the master use, assuming the budget allowed for such fees. In practice, the filmmaker might have a limited budget, but remember that if you own your song and your master recording, you actually hold two distinct copyrights.

Licensing lingo
In the world of music licensing, there are various types of music licenses, each of which is referred to by one of more common terms. It makes sense to learn these basic terms so that if you are speaking with a music publisher or anyone wishing to use one of your songs or master recordings you are starting from a common point. Here are four of the more common terms used in music licensing.

Mechanical License. This is the permission to use your song to record, manufacture, and distribute a new sound recording of your song. Even if you are recording your own song for a record label, under the terms of your contract, the label will need to secure a mechanical license before making the records and offering the song as a download. (Yes, downloads count as a record and as such, the publisher or songwriter must give advance permission to distribute or sell a song online.) Mechanicals, as they are frequently referred to, are audio-only licenses.

Synchronization License. Any use of your song in support of a visual medium is a synchronization (or synch, for short) license. When you hear a song used on a TV show or motion picture, a synch license was secured to pay the publisher for that use. Depending on the importance of the song in the context of the film or TV series, such licenses may generate tens of thousands of dollars shared by the publisher and writer.

Blanket License. Ever wonder if Queen earns a royalty when you hear "Bohemian Rhapsody" blaring over the sound system at your local bowling alley on Rock ‘n’ Bowl night? They do. The three PROs typically secure annual agreements with any business or venue that features music playback or performance as part of its operations. The cost for such blanket licenses varies depending on the size of the venue and typical audience size. For example, the blanket license fees paid by Madison Square Garden to use music during a NBA basketball game will be proportionally higher than your local bowling alley pays. But both types of venues help add to the songwriter and publisher’s revenue streams when a song is frequently played.

Master License. This is the license needed to use a master sound recording in any commercial setting. Record labels often control most masters performed by top artists as they invested the money to record them in the first place. However, more bands are deciding to take the totally independent route, which will often result in the band retaining the master rights for their sound recordings. When such a band gains enough notoriety to attract the interest of a TV or film music supervisor, they may be in a position to profit from granting a master license and a song license if they also wrote the song in question.

Note: This article does not offer a complete explanation of music copyright and licensing matters. It’s best to get the advice of an experienced entertainment attorney or music licensing expert before entering into any binding music license agreement.

Keith Hatschek teaches music business and directs the Music Management program at University of the Pacific in Stockton, California. He is a regular contributor to Echoes and has written two books on the music industry. www.hatschek.com

Story Links
ASCAP: American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers
BMI: Broadcast Music, Inc
SESAC
Musicians Business Dictionary: a helpful glossary of music business terms and definitions
Sampling Safely – A Primer to Avoiding Lawsuits: Echoes blog post

Book Recommendations
All You Need to Know About the Music Business – by Don Passman.
Now in its 7th edition (2009), this book is a classic that every songwriter or working musician should have on his or her bookshelf.

Music, Money & Success – by Jeff and Todd Brabec.
In its 6th edition (2008), this book clearly explains music licensing and publishing from top to bottom. Well worth the investment for the casual or serious songwriter.

Kohn on Music Licensing – by Al Kohn
The granddaddy of music licensing books, written by the dean of music licensing attorneys. Now in its 4th edition (2009), this 1,800-page behemoth costs over $300, but covers just about every known music licensing situation.

{ 3 trackbacks }

Copyright – the basics « Make It In Music Daily
April 4, 2011 at 6:01 am
10 Licensing Tips – Get Your Music Ready for Film and TV | Bedroom Musicians
November 7, 2011 at 1:39 pm
Music Publishing and How Michael Jackson Came to Own The Beatles Songs | ALL THINGS MICHAEL! ♥
November 14, 2012 at 12:30 pm

{ 21 comments… read them below or add one }

James Kleist March 26, 2011 at 3:41 pm

Good Day,

I would like to have produces 100 CDs for a test run. I will need the mechanicals for 26 songs. How much would your service cost me for these 100 CDs only? I do have the song writers and the major performers names.
Thank you,

James Kleist

Reply

Disc Makers March 28, 2011 at 8:06 am

Hi James-
You can get a custom quote for your CD project here: http://www.discmakers.com/selfservicequoterbeta/

Reply

James Kleist March 26, 2011 at 3:44 pm

I did mean to use the word “produced”.

Many thanks

Reply

James Kleist March 26, 2011 at 3:44 pm

ok to go!

Reply

spike penetrator March 29, 2011 at 1:33 pm

Very good article. For mechanical rights to cover songs you are releasing on a CD, contact Harry Fox agency. http://www.harryfox.com . They are the folks you go through fro mechanical licensing. Hopefully, this helps you with your project. Their rates are fairly reasonable for small runs.

Reply

Ralph March 29, 2011 at 7:06 pm

Great article! Very informative and easy to understand.

Reply

Dillon March 29, 2011 at 9:31 pm

How much does it initially cost to get work copyrighted such as songs and album art?

Reply

Bruce March 30, 2011 at 7:19 am

it barley cost nothing Dillon. you can go http://www.copyright.gov and get your copyrights online. But if you want to get your copyright faster it will cost 780 dollars. it works i paid and got my copyrights in less then a week.

Reply

Jeremy March 30, 2011 at 10:03 am

Paper filing (which I would not recommend since it took them over 1.5 years to complete my last copyright registration) costs $65. To electronically file (which takes them about 1-3 months to process) is $35.

Reply

Jeremy March 30, 2011 at 10:04 am

Also thought I’d mention that you can copyright more than one song at a time. I usually do an entire album, that way I don’t have to pay $35 for each song.

Reply

Tom-Intergalactic Express March 30, 2011 at 7:45 pm

My Engineer suggested recording about 70 song on a CD and then doing the $35 electronic filing.

We are busily doing that.

Rock-On

Tom-Intergalactic Express

Reply

DJ Park March 31, 2011 at 10:50 am

I’m interested in how I compensate the composer if I do an arrangement. Do I need the composer’s approval before I do an arrangement? What if an organization (such as a religious organization) has copyrighted the piece after the original composer’s copyright expired?

Reply

Jim Tye April 2, 2011 at 6:35 am

That was very informative. It has confirmed the answers to a lot of questions I had about copyrights.
Now I can continue in the direction I was going in.
Thanks.

Reply

James April 4, 2011 at 9:53 pm

I have a question. I am busily learning how to use my new recording gear and a friend asked me if I could come and record his band at a live gig. I would love to do it, as I could definitely use the practice with my new equipment. However, I fear that he may take the CD that I make for him and duplicate it to sell. These would be all cover songs, so I’m concerned about my exposure. If all I do is record his band live, and they do whatever they want with the final CD, what legal position does that put me in? Am I supposed to pay for a license to record what they do even though I’m not charging anything?

Reply

oxana April 6, 2011 at 1:42 pm

Very good. See also: how many rights can you lose? at villamusicrights.blogspot.com

Reply

Anne April 15, 2011 at 9:16 am

I just wanted to disagree with the poster who recommended Harry Fox (although obviously this is for mechanical licenses – not copyrights). They only handle some material, and I’ve heard they are not helpful if you’re ordering for a small pressing. I have only heard good things about the customer service at Limelight by Rightsflow – and I know they can get mechanical licenses for literally ANY song.

Reply

Anonymous December 29, 2011 at 3:01 pm

Limelight IS going through Harry Fox!  If you go to HFA directly, you just enter the amount you intend to press, and they do the calculations for you.  HFA is perfectly fine for small pressings.  I found it very easy, Limelight doesn’t make it any easier, they just take an extra fee on top to do what you can do yourself.

Reply

Drop_dwg June 8, 2011 at 12:44 am

this very…very true! get your music and lyrics protected the proper way. Do not let anyone tell you….your music and everything is protected by there computer or studio backup……ITS A LIE!

Reply

Erik Heller July 17, 2011 at 7:25 pm

In the years past, I sent a copy of my work (songs) to the L.O.C., and I was under the impression that “I” was covered, and safe. What is the latest way to safe guard any music that I record? Times have changed, and I am now returning to recording after many years. Erik Heller 

Reply

MYSTRO September 15, 2011 at 2:50 pm

Great advise from the counsel however I have a question.

What about sound libraries from SAMPLE LIBRARY COMPANIES.

One company that I know of says when you purchase tracks/samples etc from them you have purchased that license and can do what ever you wish with the library as long as you do not take their loops and sell them as your own sample library.

Further this particular company says If you got rich on it that you would owe no one because you purchased a legal copy of the samples, and that you can even use and re arrange the song as you please.

The problem with this is when I arrange a track or sample I make it my own, it becomes my arrangement that took that track to it’s pinnacle level.

Should I know be a able to request a derivative work copyright protection for that work? its only fair although I may not parse own the track or sample, that sample to me is no more than purchasing a    Fender BASS. 

Fender cant come back on me because I purchased the Bass and got a hit record with it, but they can challenge me If i design a Bass with the same electronic and design scheme and name it Richys Fender Bass.

Radio Stations are asking me for the copyright papers to my music but the sample companies told me to present them with a copy of your legal sample paperwork license and thats it.

Is that really It? CAN ANY BODY ANSWER MY QUESTION.

Reply

Anonymous December 29, 2011 at 2:59 pm

I am sorry to see that the link for mechanical license goes to Limelight and not Harry Fox Agency.  Limelight is a middle-man between the recording artist and Harry Fox.  They get a fee for something that will take you five or ten minutes to do for most songs, right on Harry Fox’s website.  For songs that are not covered by HFA, a little skillful googling usually does the trick.  I found the widow of a songwriter who had rights to a songs not licensed through HFA and she happily agreed to take a check directly from me. 

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: